Disease, Illness and Condition Library


    Cholesterol

    Cholesterol at normal levels is essential to the structure of the
    cells of the body. It plays an important role in the production of
    bile secretions, and is used by the body to make such steroid
    hormones as the sex and adrenal hormones. The liver makes
    the majority of the cholesterol needed by the body, and most
    of the rest comes from the intestines. Only about 5 percent of
    the cholesterol in the blood comes from the foods we eat.

    Cholesterol levels in the body are determined by measuring
    the lipoproteins in the blood. Lipoproteins are the proteins
    that carry fat in the bloodstream, as the fat is not water soluble
    and can not travel alone. The serum lipoproteins are known
    collectively as cholesterol and include the following types:

    Low-density lipoproteins (LDL) transport cholesterol to the tissue.
    LDLs may stick to the blood vessel walls, and are thus considered
    bad cholesterol. They are only harmful after being oxidized by
    free radicals.

    Very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) are made in the liver to
    carry fats to other parts of the body. When they shed their fat
    they are LDLs. VLDL levels reflect triglyceride levels, and are
    high when the diet contains a lot of sugar and pastry.

    High density lipoproteins return cholesterol to the liver to be
    metabolized into VLDLs and waste products. HDLs protect
    against atherosclerosis and are consider good cholesterol.

    Cholesterol and Diet

    Modern western medicine attempts to control cholesterol
    and triglyceride levels through diet and prescription medications.
    Diet itself is important but may not be the main factor in controlling
    cholesterol levels. Some researchers believe controlling stress
    levels could be the x factor in the fight against high cholesterol.

    Dietary factors affecting cholesterol not only include total calorie
    intake but also the percentage from different food groups and well
    as the type of fat ingested. Fat will also tend to boost calorie intake
    and fast food restaurants provide the most concentrated sources of
    fat. So eating a steady diet from fast food restaurants will certainly
    put you at risk of higher cholesterol levels and cholesterol
    related diseases.

    Ultimately it is the type of fat you eat that is the most important.
    Saturated fats are found in butter, coconut and palm oil, and
    hydrogenated oils. Monounsaturated fats include olive and
    canola oils. Polyunsaturated fats include safflower, sunflower,
    and corn oils. Lowering the intake of saturated fats does lower
    cholesterol levels in most people, as is strongly recommended
    by doctors. Not only does a diet high in  polyunsaturated fats
    help with cholesterol levels it can reduce the propensity to form
    blood clots, which sometimes play a role in initiating heart attacks
    and strokes.

    In addition to affecting cholesterol levels, fats cause the cell
    membranes to become too rigid, so that the cell itself cannot
    function properly. This leads to insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia.

    An interesting note: Eating some fat signals the body to stop eating,
    thus helps to reduce obesity by overeating.

    Health Considerations for Improving Cholesterol Levels

    The majority medical experts agree that the best approach to lowering high
    cholesterol levels is through positive changes in diet and lifestyle. The dietary
    guidelines are straightforward:

    * Eat less saturated fat and cholesterol by reducing or limiting the amount of
    animal products in the diet.

    * Eat more fiber rich plant foods (fruits, vegetables, grains, and legumes)

    * Lose weight if necessary

    The lifestyle guidelines are

    * Get regular cardiovascular exercise

    * Don’t smoke

    * Reduce or eliminate consumption of coffee (both with caffeine and
    decaffeinated)

    In a lot of cases, dietary therapy alone is not sufficient to get lipid levels
    into the desired ranges. Fortunately, there are several natural compounds
    that can lower cholesterol levels and other significant risk factors for coronary
    artery disease. In fact, when all factors are considered (cost, safety,
    effectiveness, etc.), the natural alternatives presented below offer significant
    advantages over standard drug therapy. The natural products are best utilized
    in a comprehensive program that stresses a healthy diet and lifestyle.

    Conventional Drug Therapy

    Conventional drug therapy designed to lower cholesterol levels is prescribed
    at an alarming rate – nearly thirty million prescriptions per year – due to
    aggressive marketing by drug companies. The main problem is that these
    drugs have not yet shown, in long term studies, to lengthen a person’s life
    span. Several of the drugs are, in point of fact, associated with an increase
    in non-vascular mortality. In other words, while these drugs reduced the
    number of deaths from heart attacks and strokes, they increased the
    overall death rate.

    One of the reasons why cholesterol lowering drugs may add to overall
    mortality is that they are toxic to the liver and exceedingly carcinogenic
    (cancer causing). An article published in Journal of the American Medical
    Association (JAMA) summarized the carcinogenicity studies of cholesterol
    lowering drugs and clearly demonstrated that the risk of carcinogenicity for
    these drugs is far above recently issued FDA guidelines. The article asked
    several questions and provided answers that were extremely interesting.

    Here is an example:

    How did it happen that cholesterol lowering drugs were approved by the
    FDA for long term use in spite of their animal carcinogenicity? To address
    the question, the Encyclopedia of Natural Medicine obtained minutes of
    the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Advisory Committee meeting (under the
    freedom of Information Act) at which lovastatin and gemfibrozil – the most
    popular cholesterol lowering drugs – were discussed… The only reported
    discussion of animal carcinogenicity studies at the FDA advisory committee
    meeting on lovastatin (February 19 and 20, 1987) was by a representative
    of Merck Sharp & Dohme (makers of he Mevacor brand of lovastatin), who
    downplayed the importance of the studies.

    The minutes from the meeting on gemfibrozil (October 17, 1988) are
    particularly revealing. The committee did discuss the carcinogenicity
    of the drug. The minutes state:

    Dr. Troendle [deputy director, Division of Metabolism and Endocrine Drug
    Products for the FDA] noted that gemfibrozil belongs to a class of drugs
    that has been shown to increase total mortality. It has been shown to have
    animal carcinogenicity, and she does not believe that the FDA has ever approved
    a drug for ling term prophylactic use that was carcinogenic at
    such low multiples of the human doses of gemfibrozil.

    When asked to vote at the end of the meeting, only three of the nine
    members for the advisory committee believed the potential benefit of
    gemfibrozil outweighed the risk. However, the FDA ignored the committee’s
    recommendation and decided to grant gemfibrozil drug approval. Lopid
    (gemfibrozil) is now the second most popular lipid lowering drug, behind
    Mevacor (lovastatin).

    The bottom line is that thee drugs have been shown to be extremely
    carcinogenic in animal studies. Although extrapolation of animal data
    to humans is an uncertain process, there is enough evidence of
    carcinogenicity to warrant concern. The authors of the interview advised
    that lipid lowering drug treatment be avoided except in patients at high
    risk for an immediate heart attack or stroke. Yet the widespread use of
    these drugs defies this recommendation.

    Natural Cholesterol Support - Vitamins, Minerals, Supplements

    Niacin

    Even though niacin has demonstrated better overall results than other cholesterol
    lowering agents in reducing the risk of coronary heart disease, physicians are
    often hesitant to prescribe niacin. The reason is a widespread perception that
    niacin is a difficult and somewhat dangerous medicine.
    There is a great deal confusion about the benefits versus the risks for patients
    who take niacin. In contrast, most physicians are unacquainted with the
    considerable risks and limited benefits of commonly used prescription
    cholesterol lowering agents.

    In addition, since niacin is a widely available generic agent, no pharmaceutical
    company stands to generate the enormous profits that the other cholesterol
    lowering drugs have enjoyed. As a result, niacin is not intensively advertised
    like the other drugs. Despite the advantages of niacin over the cholesterol
    lowering drugs, niacin accounts for only 7.9 percent of all lipid lowering
    prescriptions.

    The cholesterol lowering activity of niacin was first described in the 1950s.
    It is now know that niacin does much more than lower the total cholesterol
    levels. Specifically, niacin has been shown to lower LDL cholesterol, Lp(a),
    triglyceride, and fibrinogen (a blood protein that causes clot formation)
    levels, while raising HDL cholesterol levels.

    An extensive evaluation of cholesterol lowering drugs (The Coronary Drug
    Project) demonstrated that niacin was the only cholesterol lowering agent to
    actually reduce overall mortality. Its effects are long lasting, as demonstrated
    in a fifteen year follow up study to the Coronary Drug Project. The follow up
    study showed that the long term death rate for patients treated with niacin was
    actually 11% lower than that of the placebo group, even though the treatment has
    been discontinued in most patients many years earlier. In other words,
    even though the patients were no longer taking the niacin, they still had al lower
    death rate. In contrast, patients being treated with cholesterol lowering drugs
    (clofibrate and/or cholestyramine) actually showed an increased death rate.
    Clofibrate was associated with a 36% higher mortality rate. Presumably both
    clofibrate and cholestyramine lowered cholesterol levels and reduced the
    mortality rate for coronary artery disease but increased the risk of dying
    prematurely form cancer, complications of gallbladder surgery (clofibrate
    causes gallstones), and other conditions.

    Clofibrate and, to a lesser extent, cholestyramine have been replaced by
    drugs such as lovastatin (Mevacor), pravastatin (Pravochol), simvastatin
    (Zocor), and gemfibrozil (Lopid). Are these new drugs effective at reducing
    mortality? The jury is still out. Preliminary studies are showing some benefits.
    For example, a five year safety and efficacy study of lovastatin involved 745
    patients with severe hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol levels greater
    than 360 mg/dl). The study demonstrated that the efficacy of lovastatin was
    maintained over time, there was no increase in mortality, and lovastatin was
    by and large well tolerated. Longer term studies with larger patient populations
    are now in progress with all of the statin drugs, but these results will not be
    presented for several years. In the meantime, millions of Americans are being
    placed on these drugs.

    Comparative Studies: Lovastatin vs Niacin

    To evaluate how niacin compares in safety and efficacy to the new lipid
    lowering drugs, one need only examine the results of several recent head
    to head comparison studies. In 1994, the Annals of Internal Medicine
    published the first clinical study that directly compared niacin and lovastatin.
    The twenty six week study was performed at five clinics and involved 136
    patients who had coronary heart disease and LDL cholesterol levels greater
    than 160 mg/dl, and/or more than two coronary heart disease risk factors,
    or an LDL cholesterol level greater than 190 mg/dl without coronary heart
    disease or with few coronary heart disease risk factors. Patients were first
    placed on a four week diet, after which suitable patients were randomly
    assigned to receive treatment with either lovastatin (20 mg/day) or niacin
    (1.5 g/day). On the basis of the LDL cholesterol response and patients
    tolerance, the doses were sequentially increased after ten and eighteen
    weeks of treatment, to 40 and 80 mg/day of niacin, respectively. In the two
    patient groups, 66% of patients treated with lovastatin, and 54% of patients
    treated with niacin. Here were the results on lipoprotein levels:

    Group     Week 10     Week 18     Week 26

    LDL Cholesterol Reduction
    Lovastatin   26%             28%              32%
    Niacin          5%              16%               23%

    HDL Cholesterol Increase
    Lovastatin    6%               8%                7%
    Niacin          20%             29%              33%

    Lp(a) Lipoprotein Reduction
    Lovastatin     0%               0%                0%
    Niacin           14%            30%               35%

    These results show that, while lovastatin produced greater reduction in LDL
    cholesterol levels, niacin provided overall results despite the fact that fewer
    patients were able to endure a full dosage of niacin because of skin flushing.
    The percentage increase in HDL cholesterol, a more significant indicator for
    coronary heart disease, was dramatically in favor of niacin (thirty percent
    versus seven percent). Equally as impressive was the percentage decrease
    in Lp(a) level with niacin treatment. While niacin produced a 35% reduction
    in Lp(a) levels, lovastatin did not produce any effect. Niacin’s effect on Lp(a)
    in this study confirmed a previous study that showed that niacin (4 grams/day)
    reduced Lp(a) levels by 38%.

    Another comparative study focused on determining the lipoprotein responses
    to niacin, gemfibrozil, and lovastatin in patients with normal total cholesterol
    levels but low levels of HDL cholesterol. The first phase of the study compared
    lipoprotein responses to lovastatin and gemfibrozil in sixty one middle aged
    men with low HDL levels. In the second phase, thirty seven patients agreed to
    take niacin; twenty seven patients finished this phase at a dose of 4.5 g/day.
    In the first phase, gemfibrozil therapy increased HDL cholesterol levels by 10%
    and lovastatin by 6%. In the second phase, niacin therapy was shown to raise
    HDL cholesterol levels by 30%.

    Dealing with the Side Effects of Niacin

    The side effects of niacin are fairly common knowledge. The most common
    and bothersome side effect is the skin flushing that characteristically occurs
    twenty to thirty minutes after the niacin is taken. Other sporadic side effects
    of niacin include gastric irritation, nausea, and liver damage. In an attempt to
    combat the acute reaction of skin flushing, several manufacturers began
    marketing “sustained release,” “timed release,” or “slow release” niacin
    products. These formulations allow the niacin to be absorbed gradually,
    thereby reducing the flushing reaction. However, while these forms of niacin
    reduce skin flushing, they actually have proven to be more toxic to the liver.
    In a recent study published in JAMA, it was strongly recommended that
    sustained released niacin be restricted from use because of the high
    percentage (seventy eight percent) of patient withdrawal due to side
    effects; 52% of patients who took the sustained release niacin developed
    liver toxicity, while none of the patients who took regular niacin developed
    liver toxicity.

    Because niacin can impair blood sugar control, it should be used with close
    observation in patients with diabetes. Niacin should not be used by patients
    with preexisting liver disease or elevated levels of liver enzymes. For these
    patient groups, gugulipid (an extract of Commiphora mukul), garlic, or
    pantethine recommended.

    The safest form of niacin currently is known as inositol hexaniacinate.
    This form of niacin has long been used in Europe to lower cholesterol levels
    and to improve blood flow in cases of intermittent claudication. It produces
    slightly better results than standard niacin but is much better tolerated, both
    in terms of flushing and, more important, long term side effects.

    Niacin: Practical Ideas

    Regardless of the form of niacin being used, periodic checking (every three
    months, minimum) for cholesterol and liver enzyme levels in the blood is
    important. Please tell your physician that you are taking niacin and that
    you wish to be monitored.

    Because of its low cost and proven efficacy, niacin should be considered
    the first cholesterol lowering agent to try. The problems with niacin (skin
    flushing and other side effects) can be avoided by using inositol hexaniacinate.
    Sustained release niacin should not be used. If pure crystalline niacin is being
    used, start with a dose of 100 mg three times per day, and carefully increase
    the dosage over a period of four to six weeks to the full therapeutic dose of
    1.5 g to 3 g daily in divided doses. If inositol hexaniacinate is being used,
    begin with 500 mg three times per day for two weeks, then increase to
    1,000 mg. It is best to take either crystalline niacin or inositol hexaniacinate
    with meals.

    Pantethine

    Pantethine is the stable form of pantetheine, the active form of vitamin B5,
    or pantothenic acid. Pantetheine is the most important component of
    coenzyme A (CoA). This enzyme is involved in the transport of fats to and
    from cells, as well as to the energy producing compartments within the cell.
    Without coenzyme A, the cells of our body would not be able to utilize fats
    as energy.

    For some reason, pantethine has significant lipid lowering activity, while
    pantothenic acid has very little (if any) effect in lowering cholesterol and
    triglyceride levels. Pantethine administration (standard dose: 900 mg per
    day) has been shown to appreciably reduce serum triglyceride levels
    (by 32%), while increasing HDL cholesterol levels (by 23%). These effects
    are most striking when the toxicity of pantethine (virtually none) is compared
    to that of conventional lipid lowering drugs. Pantethine acts by inhibiting
    cholesterol synthesis and accelerating the utilization of fat as an energy
    source. There appears to be no toxicity or side effects from taking pantethine.

    Of the natural lipid lowering agents discussed, pantethine has the best
    effect on blood triglyceride levels. Therefore, it is quite helpful for individuals
    who primarily have elevated triglyceride levels. Pantethine is also appropriate
    for treating diabetics, since niacin is associated with impairment of insulin
    action. Several clinical studies have shown that pantethine produces
    impressive lipid lowering effects without side effects in diabetics.

    The dosage for pantethine is 300 mg three times per day. It has an excellent
    safety profile, and no significant side effects have been reported in the clinical
    trials.

    Vitamin C and Cholesterol

    Numerous population based and clinical studies have shown that vitamin C
    levels correspond with total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels. In one
    of the best designed studies, it was shown that the higher the vitamin C
    content of the blood, the lower the total cholesterol and triglyceride levels
    and the higher the HDL cholesterol level. The beneficial effects on HDL levels
    were particularly impressive. For each 0.5 mg/dl increase in vitamin C content
    of the blood, there was an increase in HDL cholesterol of 14.9 mg/dl in women
    and 2.1 mg/dl in men. Remember, for every one percent in crease in HDL
    cholesterol levels, the risk of heart disease drops four percent. This study
    and others demonstrate that vitamin C supplementation increases HDL levels
    even in well nourished individuals with normal levels of vitamin C in their blood.  
    The most important effect of high dosage vitamin C therapy in reducing the
    risk of heart disease may turn out to be a reduction in Lp(a) and its antioxidant
    activity.

    Garlic

    Although garlic exerts a wide-ranging spectrum of beneficial effects, the
    modern use of garlic has focused on its ability to lower blood pressure
    and cholesterol levels, in the attempt to reduce the risk of dying
    prematurely from a heart attack or stroke.

    The volatile compounds of garlic are by and large considered to be
    responsible for most of the pharmacological properties. Fresh garlic
    contains 0.1 to 0.36 percent of a volatile oil composed of sulfur containing
    compounds: allicin, diallyl disulfide, diallyltrisulfide, and others. Allicin is
    mainly responsible for the pungent odor of garlic, as well as its pharmacology.
    Allicin is formed by the action of the enzyme alliinase on the compound allin.
    The essential oil of garlic yields approximately 60% of its weight in allicin
    after exposure to alliinase. The enzyme alliinase is inactivated by heat,
    which accounts for the fact that cooked garlic produces neither as strong
    an odor as raw garlic nor nearly as powerful physiological effects.

    Commercial Garlic Preparations

    The bulk of studies that showed a positive effect from administering garlic
    and garlic preparation used a form of garlic that delivers a ample dosage of
    allicin. Since allicin is the component of garlic that is responsible for its easily
    identifiable odor, some manufacturers have developed highly sophisticated
    methods of providing the full benefits of garlic; they provide odorless garlic
    products concentrated for alliin because alliin is relatively odorless until it is
    converted to allicin in the body. Products concentrated for alliin and other
    sulfur components provide all of the benefits of fresh garlic but are more
    publicly acceptable. Based on a great deal of clinical research, the
    recommendation is that a commercial garlic product should provide a
    daily dose of at least 10 mg of alliin, or a total allicin potential of 4,000
    mcg. The German Commission E, and expert panel that sets dosage
    requirements to allow for therapeutic claims in Germany, requires that
    products deliver the equivalent of 4,000 mg of fresh garlic – roughly
    one to four cloves.

    Manufacturers of garlic products all publicize their preparation as being
    the best. How do you know who to believe? First of all, preparations
    standardized for alliin content are viewed by most garlic experts as the most
    favorable. However, there are other compounds in garlic that exert beneficial
    effects, including S-allylcysteines and gamma-glutamylpeptides.  Therefore,
    the best product would be one that is rich in all garlic compounds and most
    resembles fresh garlic.

    What about aged garlic? It is notible that the expert panel of the German
    Commission E specified that the daily dose of garlic be equivalent to fresh,
    raw garlic. Since aged garlic preparations do not contain the beneficial
    compounds found in fresh garlic, they do not meet the Commission E
    monograph guidelines and cannot be marketed in Germany with the claims
    allowed for garlic. The Commission E was very specific: the daily dosage
    recommended to achieve the benefits associated with garlic requires the
    equivalent of 4,000 mg of fresh garlic.

    To highlight the superiority of fresh garlic preparations over aged garlic,
    let’s examine the results of the effects of both on blood pressure and
    cholesterol and triglyceride levels.

                                  AGED GARLIC        FRESH GARLIC
                                                                   PREPARATIONS
    Total Cholesterol   7% reduction             10-12% reduction

    LDL cholesterol      4% reduction             15% reduction
    HDL cholesterol      no effect                    10% increase
    Systolic blood          5 mm Hg                   11 mm Hg
    pressure                  reduction                    reduction
    Diastolic blood         no effect                     5 mm Hg
    Pressure                                                     reduction
    Daily dosage            7.2 grams                  >4,000 mcg of
                                                                         allicin

    The data for aged garlic in the preceding table are based on a recently
    completed double blind study of forty one men with beginning cholesterol
    levels in the 220 to 290 mg/dl range. The men received either aged garlic
    (7.2 grams per day) or a placebo for six months and then were switched to
    the other supplement for an additional four months. The results demonstrated
    a reduction of total cholesterol by 7%, and LDL cholesterol by 4%, but no
    changes in HDL cholesterol or triglyceride levels were noted. The systolic
    blood pressure dropped an average of 5.5% during the aged garlic period,
    but there was no change in diastolic blood pressure.

    Now let’s take a look at the effect of fresh garlic preparations in similar
    patient populations. A large number of double blind placebo controlled
    studies have been preformed on patients with initial cholesterol levels
    greater than 200 mg/dl. Supplementation with commercial preparations
    that provided a daily dose of at least 10 mg of alliin, or a total allicin
    potential of 4,00 mcg, were found to lower total serum cholesterol levels
    by about 10 to 12%. LDL cholesterol levels decreased by about 15%, HDL
    cholesterol levels usually increased by about 10%, and triglyceride, levels
    typically dropped 15%. These results were generally achieved within one
    to three months; significantly better results are typically achieved in a shorter
    amount of time with the fresh garlic preparations compared to aged garlic.

    Reduction of blood pressure has also proved greater when using fresh
    garlic preparations than when using aged garlic. With fresh garlic preparations,
    typical reduction of 11mm Hg for the systolic and 5.0 in the diastolic are usually
    achieved within a one to three month period.

    It has been concluded in expert reviews that the anti atherosclerotic effects of
    garlic are derived from alliin and allicin. The bottom line is that preparations
    standardized for alliin content provide the greatest assurance of quality.

    Garlic and Heart Disease

    A garlic supplement may not be necessary if the dietary intake of garlic
    and onion can be increased. In a 1979 population study, researchers studies
    three populations of vegetarians in the Jain community of India who consumed
    differing amounts of garlic and onions. Numerous favorable effects on blood
    lipids were observed in the group that consumed the largest amounts of both.
    Blood fibrinogen levels were highest in the group that ate no onions or garlic.
    This study is quite significant because the subjects had nearly the same diets,
    except in their levels of garlic and onion intake.

    Gugulipid

    Gugulipid is the standardized extract of the mukul myrrh tree, which is
    native to India. The active components of gugulipid are two compounds:
    Z-guggulsterone and E-guggulsterone. Several clinical studies have
    established that gugulipid has an ability to lower both cholesterol and
    triglyceride levels. Characteristically, total cholesterol levels dropped
    14 to 27% in a four to twelve week period, while LDL cholesterol and
    triglyceride levels dropped from 25 to 35% and 22 to 30%, respectively.
    HDL cholesterol levels on average showed and increase of 16 to 20%.

    The effect of gugulipid on cholesterol and triglyceride levels is similar to
    that of lipid lowering drugs. While those drugs are associated with some
    degree of toxicity, gugulipid is without side effects. Safety studies in rats,
    rabbits, and monkeys have demonstrated it to be nontoxic. It is also
    considered safe to use during pregnancy.

    The mechanism of gugulipid’s cholesterol lowering action is its ability to
    boost the liver’s metabolism of LDL cholesterol.

    In addition to lowering lipid levels, gugulipid has been shown in animals to
    prevent atherosclerosis and aid in the regression of preexisting atherosclerotic
    plaques. This implies that it may have a similar effect in humans. Gugulipid also
    has a mild effect in inhibiting platelet aggregation and promoting fibrinolysis,
    suggesting that it may also prevent the development of a stroke or embolism.

    The dosage of gugulipid is based on its guggulsterone content.
    Clinical studies have demonstrated that gugulipid extract, standardized
    to contain to 25 mg of guggulsterone per 500 mg tablet, given three times
    daily is an effective treatment for elevated cholesterol levels, elevated
    triglyceride levels, or both. No significant side effects have been reported
    with purified gugulipid preparations, but crude guggul preparations such
    as gum guggul are associated with side effects (skin rashes, diarrhea, etc.)

    Other Natural Ingredients That Could Help

    Research has shown that consuming policosanol, a nutrient found in raw
    sugar cane and beeswax, significantly decreases LDL cholesterol levels,
    increases HDL levels and lowers total triglycerides, without raising blood
    sugar levels.

    Lecithin oil is high in nutrients.  It helps to raise HDL levels and inhibits the
    absorption of cholesterol from foods.  Two of the nutrients found in lecithin
    help to cleanse the liver, so that it can function more effectively, removing
    more fats from the bloodstream.

    Pumpkin seed oil contains nutrients we refer to as essential fatty acids.  
    They are also used by the body to create hormones.  Consuming the essential,
    polyunsaturated fatty acids may help to reduce the amount of cholesterol
    produced by the liver.  The oil has also been shown to enhance the
    cholesterol-lowering ability of policosanol and other nutrients.

    D-limonene is a nutrient found in orange peel oil.  It has been used to
    successfully dissolve gallstones, which are composed of cholesterol.
    It reduces blood cholesterol levels, additionally.

    Phytosterols, which are compounds found in plants that are similar in
    structure to cholesterol, have been shown to decrease cholesterol absorption
    in the gut by competing for absorption.  Beta-sitosterol, for example, has been
    shown to inhibit cholesterol absorption by about 50% and lower blood
    cholesterol levels.


    Sources: Merck Manual of Medical Information
    Encyclopedia of Natural Medicine


    Helpful Natural Supplements for Cholesterol Health

    Cholest-Natural - XL - An Effective Natural Alternative to Statin Drugs -
    Reduce both production and absorption of cholesterol naturally  - Continue  

    Cholesto-Rite - Natural Herbal Formula for Cholesterol Control
    Cholesto-Rite is an all natural herbal formula for Cholesterol Control, that
    Helps Control LDL (bad cholesterol), Maintain healthy HDL levels and the
    Reduce Risk of Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Attack and Stroke.
    Continue

    Cholestasys - Support for Healthy Cholesterol Levels.
    As part of a healthy lifestyle, Cholestasys helps promote better well-being
    and healthy cholesterol levels already within the normal range . . . without
    negative side effects. Cholestasys contains a proprietary blend of vitamins,
    minerals, and herbs designed
    for maximum results.

    With Cholestasys you can enjoy:

    * Help to maintain healthy cholesterol levels
    * Support for healthy cholesterol function in the body
    * Antioxidant qualities to support healthy blood circulation
    * Improved sense of well-being
    * Better overall health

Purchase Remedies
Home
Library Index
Cholesterol   HDL/LDL   Heart Healthy Foods   General Guidelines  Stress and Cholesterol   Library     
Additional Library
Resources